THE IMPACT OF SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGY ON THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A CASE STUDY OF A MANUFACTURING COMPANY at KHARTOUM STATE

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of business administration, Business Studies Section –Elbyan Science & Technology College, Khartoum, Sudan

2 Department of business administration, College of Business Studies -Sudan University of Science & Technology, Khartoum, Sudan

3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Community, Department of Humanitarians and Management Science, Jouf University,

4 Department of business administration, Business Studies Section –University of Bahari

Abstract

Purpose of this paper: The aim of this paper is to propose a systems view to link supply chain (SC) strategy to a company’s financial performance by developing a scenario approach. The paper applies five scenarios under differing financial performance contexts to analyse the relationship between supply chain performance and the overall financial performance.
Design/methodology/approach: An integrated supply chain performance measurement system was created and implemented to demonstrate and utilise the relationship between SC performance metrics and the financial performance metrics. A scenario analysis approach was undertaken using five main alternative scenarios in order to explore how this procedure could be applied with regard to various possible financial results. A case study of a manufacturing company was conducted and analysed to illustrate the applicability of the research procedure.
Findings: The results reflected the improvement in the efficiency and the effectiveness of SC strategy in connection with the company’s short-term strategic financial objectives. The analysis showed that any improvement in the SC operations’ performance will lead to better supply chain management (SCM), and consequently enhance the company’s overall financial performance. An improvement in SC performance as well as financial performance has been shown for the three conditions (optimistic, normal and pessimistic) following the proposed procedure.
Value: A systems view is introduced to integrate SC strategy and the company's overall financial strategy under different possible scenarios based on the systems view problem-solving model. Five main alternative scenarios are defined given the related targeted financial outcomes and their corresponding present paths (managing SC costs, increasing SC agility, improving SC reliability, increasing SC responsiveness and managing SC assets).
The system can be operated in two directions given two possible loops. A company can formulate SC strategy to achieve targeted strategic financial objectives or it can start with an unsatisfactory financial performance and then formulate the corresponding SC strategy to enhance it.
Research limitations/implications: The research study makes an original contribution in the direction of linking SC strategy to a company's financial strategy through focusing on studying the relationships between SCM practices and financial performance improvements. Further research should investigate and compare the results from several companies in different sectors of manufacturers in different locations. 
Practical implications: The paper follows a systems view which can help in determining the most appropriate SC strategy with regard to targeted financial objectives. This paper benefits from data extracted from a manufacturing company by evaluating the applicability of the model developed under a different set of scenarios.

Basu, R., 2001. New criteria of performance management: A transition from enterprise to collaborative supply chain. Measuring Business Excellence 5, 7-12.
Beynon, M., Curry, B., Morgan, P., 2000. The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modelling. The International Journal of Management Science 28, 37-50.
Cagnazzo, L., Taticchi, P., Brun, A., 2010. The role of performance measurement systems to support quality improvement initiatives at supply chain level. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 59, 163-185.
Camerinelli, E., Cantu, A., 2006. Measuring the Value of the Supply Chain: A Framework. Supply Chain Practice 8, 40-59.
Elgazzar, S., Tipi, N.S., Hubbard, N.J., Leach, D.Z., 2010. Incorporating fuzzy AHP in SCOR model for measuring supply chain operations performance: a case study of an Egyptian natural bottled water company. In: Proceedings from: The 15th Annual Logistics Research Network Conference. Harrogate, UK.
Elgazzar, S., Tipi, N.S., Hubbard, N.J., Leach, D.Z., 2011. A SW application system for measuring supply chain operations' performance using SCOR FAHP technique. In: Proceedings from:  The 2011 International Conference on Business and Economics Research. Cairo, Egypt.
Elgazzar, S., Tipi, N.S., Hubbard, N.J., Leach, D.Z., 2012a. Linking supply chain processes' performance to a company's financial strategic objectives. European Journal of Operational Research223, 276-289.
Elgazzar, S., Tipi, N.S., Hubbard, N.J., Leach, D.Z., 2012b. Linking SCM strategy to financial performance: a scenario analysis approach. In: Proceedings from: The 17th Annual Logistics Research Network Conference, Cranfield, UK.
Elgazzar, S. 2013. Enhancing the company’s financial performance through managing the performance of supply chain operations: a case study of an Egyptian manufacturing company. PhD thesis, University of Huddersfield, UK.
Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., McGaughey, R.E., 2004. A framework for supply chain performance measurement, International Journal of Production Economics87, 333-347.
Kremers, L., 2010. The Link between Supply Chain and Finance. Supply Chain Asia, 22-25.
Li, S., Ragu-Nathanb, B., Ragu-Nathanb, T. S., Rao, S.S., 2006. The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega-International Journal of Management Science 34, 107-124.
Mitroff, I.I., Betz, F., Pondy, L.R., Sagasti, F., 1974. On managing science in the systems age: two schemas for the study of science as a whole systems phenomenon. Interfaces 4, 46-58.
Prajogo, D., Oke, A., Olhager,J., 2016. Supply chain processes: Linking supply logistics integration, supply performance, lean processes and competitive performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 36, 220-238. 
Toyli, J., Häkkinen, L., Ojala, L., Naula, T., 2008. Logistics and financial performance, An analysis of 424 Finnish small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management38, 57-80.
Wagner, S.M., Grosse-Ruyken, P.T., Erhun, F., 2012. The Link between Supply Chain Fit and Financial Performance of the Firm. Journal of Operations Management 30, 340-353.
Wisner, P., 2011. Linking Supply Chain Performance to a Firm’s Financial Performance. Supply Chain Management Review.
Woei, L.S., 2008. Supply chain performance and financial success of selected companies on bursa Malaysia. Masters dissertation, University of Malaya, Malaysia.
Zuriekat, M., Salameh, R., Alrawashdeh, S., 2011. Participation in Performance Measurement Systems and Level of Satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Social Science 2, 159-169.